Melo, pas Melot, Jean-Pierre. Ce dernier n'est pas trop spécialiste des polypores.
La dernière classification de l'espèce figure dans un article collectif, la citation d'auteurs est : (Rivoire, Trichies & Vlasák) B. Rivoire & Vlasák f., in Spirin, Runnel, Vlasák, Viner, Barrett, Ryvarden, Bernicchia, Rivoire, Ainsworth, Grebenc, Cartabia, Niemelä, Larsson & Miettinen, Stud. Mycol. 107: 227 (2024).
Il s'agit d'un vaste regroupement, voici l'abstract :
Abstract: Based on seven- and three-gene datasets, we discuss four alternative approaches for a reclassification of Fomitopsidaceae (Polyporales,
Basidiomycota). After taking into account morphological diversity in the family, we argue in favour of distinguishing three genera only, viz. Anthoporia,
Antrodia and Fomitopsis. Fomitopsis becomes a large genus with 128 accepted species, containing almost all former Fomitopsis spp. and most species
formerly placed in Antrodia, Daedalea and Laccocephalum. Genera Buglossoporus, Cartilosoma, Daedalea, Melanoporia, Neolentiporus, alongside twenty
others, are treated as synonyms of Fomitopsis. This generic scheme allows for morphologically distinct genera in Fomitopsidaceae, unlike other schemes
we considered. We provide arguments for retaining Fomitopsis and suppressing earlier (Daedalea, Caloporus) or simultaneously published generic names
(Piptoporus) considered here as its synonyms. Taxonomy of nine species complexes in the genus is revised based on ITS, ITS + TEF1, ITS + TEF1 + RPB1
and ITS + TEF1 + RPB2 datasets. In total, 17 species are described as new to science, 26 older species are reinstated and 26 currently accepted species
names are relegated to synonymy. A condensed identification key for all accepted species in the genus is provided.
Jplm
J'ai mis en rouge un passage qui devrait plaire à Castor.